<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Basic Verbs &#187; shadows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://basicverbs.com/tag/shadows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://basicverbs.com</link>
	<description>Design AND Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:51:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Design Trends: December 2009</title>
		<link>http://basicverbs.com/design-trends-december-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://basicverbs.com/design-trends-december-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cu3er]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shadows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://basicverbs.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I&#8217;ve noticed two trends starting up. Curled drop-shadows and cu3er.
One is the heavy use of these drop-shadows that expand at the sides of blocks. This gives the object a feel like it&#8217;s raised up off the screen more than it is. I actually like this when it&#8217;s done in moderation.
Examples:


Check out the nav bar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I&#8217;ve noticed two trends starting up. Curled drop-shadows and <a href="http://www.progressivered.com/cu3er/">cu3er</a>.</p>
<p>One is the heavy use of these drop-shadows that expand at the sides of blocks. This gives the object a feel like it&#8217;s raised up off the screen more than it is. I actually like this when it&#8217;s done in moderation.</p>
<p>Examples:</p>
<ol>
<li>
Check out the nav bar on <a href="http://www.atlantis.com/default.aspx">Atlantis.com</a>. Not extremely fond of the fact the shadow pulls up on both sides (almost as if the nav bar is curling up towards you), but it&#8217;s subtle enough not to look stupid.
</li>
<li>
<a href="http://webdesignledger.com/">Web Design Ledger</a> makes obvious use of this effect on their post &#8220;thumbnails&#8221;. This effect is pretty exaggerated but it&#8217;s not done on both sides and therefore seems more likely to occur in real life (as opposed to someone holding a hair dryer to the middle of a gooey sticker).
</li>
</ol>
<p>Anyway, I totally approve of this new trend and plan on using it in the near future.</p>
<p>The 2nd trend I&#8217;ve noticed is <a href="http://www.progressivered.com/cu3er/">cu3er</a>. It&#8217;s been particularly popular since <a href="http://www.kriesi.at/">kriesi</a> used it on his most recent template over at <a href="http://themeforest.net/item/display-3-in-1-business-portfolio-html-theme/70576">ThemeForest</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with cu3er. I actually think the creator, Stefan Kovac, did a great job and it&#8217;s wonderful for him to offer it for free. The problem I have is that it is quickly becoming the centerpiece of shitty themes and people are actually buying them up because of the super-cool Flash slideshow. This is a problem because I don&#8217;t want the web to travel in that direction.</p>
<p>I (and I&#8217;m sure Stefan) would really appreciate cu3er being used responsibly by being used a little more subtle. For instance, instead of it being huge and going through every hip transition known to man, why not make it small and just use 1 transition for each site? That would encourage re-usability of the slideshow as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://basicverbs.com/design-trends-december-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
